A month after its release, it’s clear thatBarbiehas become an outright cultural phenomenon. While everyone expected it to be a hit, it’s hard to believe anyone was anticipating the degree; in the last week, it passed 2008’sThe Dark Knightas Warner Bros.' all-time highest-grossing film domestically (unadjusted for inflation).

In a year in which blockbusters have been met with greatly varying degrees of success, the film industry absolutely needed a hit of this kind. But already, it’s evident that studios are learning the wrong lessons fromBarbie; with the recent news that a Hot Wheels movie has been greenlit, it seems as though executives believe movies about toys are the next big trend. But this ignores all the significant factors that helped shapeBarbie’s cultural impact, and if studios don’t remember the poor luck they’ve had in the past adapting toys to the big screen, they run the risk of repeating past mistakes.

Still from The Lego Movie

The Rise and Fall of the LEGO Universe

For years, making movies about toys and action figures almost always spelled a recipe for disaster. Works such as the 2000Dungeons and Dragons, 2012’sBattleship, and 1987’sMasters of the Universewere critical and financial bombs. While Michael Bay’sTransformersfranchise was financially lucrative for years, they were almost always critically reviled. Even the one minor early success, 1985’sClue, still only has a cult following to this day.

This all changed in 2014 withThe LEGO Movie. Almost no one expected anything from it, but against all odds, it was one of thebest-reviewed films of 2014and grossed nearly half a billion worldwide. Immediately, Warner Bros. greenlit a sequel and several spinoffs, and at the time, it seemed like a logical next step. TheLEGOuniverse was filled with seemingly endless possibilities, and people were excited to see the universe explored even further.

Stereotypical and Weird Barbie in a Matrix Moment

Related:Barbie: 10 Movies to Watch if You Loved Greta Gerwig’s Movie

Initially, this investment paid off; the first spinoff, 2017’sThe LEGO Batman Movie, was another big critical and financial hit. But things quickly went south.The LEGO Ninjago Moviereleased just seven months later, received mixed reviews for not adding anything new to the now-familiarformula, and the box office intake was much smaller as well. And whileThe Lego Movie 2: The Second Part, released in 2019, was better received by critics, it was another significant box office disappointment.

Barbie Bench Scene With Elderly Woman

Warner Bros. quietly canceled the other planned spinoffs and sold the franchise rights to Universal. Obviously, the oversaturation of theLEGObrand in a short period of time helped lead to the franchise’s downfall. But Warner Bros. had forgotten the subversive spark that made the original installment such a classic and transcended the brand name. While all the spinoffs were enjoyable to varying degrees, it’s clear that the increasing law of new surprises had turned theLEGOfranchise from something exciting and original intojust another recognizable IP.

Greta Gerwig Made Barbie Great

In theory, the recipe forBarbie’s phenomenal success looks obvious. When it was first conceived in the 2010s, almost everyone rolled their eyes at the concept of a feature-lengthBarbiemovie. Only in 2021, when indie darling filmmaker Greta Gerwigsigned on to direct, did curiosity about the project start to build. Said curiosity only kept growing with each new casting announcement; from Margot Robbie to Ryan Gosling, to America Ferrera, to Kate McKinnon, it was clear Gerwig was filling her film with the biggest talent in the industry she could find.

And upon its release last month, much like recent female-driven blockbustersWonder WomanandCaptain Marvel,Barbieperformed nearly double its box office projections in addition to rave reviews. And more importantly, it was unmistakably the work of an auteur; this was Greta Gerwig’s third film out of three that delicately explored a young woman coming into her own identity in a world determined to put a label on her. And with the help of immaculate production and costume design, it was clear that this was not a corporate product but the vision of a gifted director brought to fruition.

And while this quality spoke so strongly to people, studios are already starting to learn the wrong lessons. As has been the case in the past, executives are always focused on “what” the next big trend is and not “why” a film becomes a hit; as proven by Warner Bros.‘recent greenlight of a Hot Wheels movie, they are less concerned with the factors that madeBarbiea great film and instead believe the key to success is adapting more toy properties to the big screen.

Related:Why Barbie is One of the Most Important and Progressive Movies of All Time

Trust Your Filmmakers, Not Your Toys

As proven by the rise and fall of theLEGOfranchise, adapting toys to the big screen isn’t automatically the key to success. People didn’t respond toBarbiebecause it was a recognizable IP; they responded to it because it was a subversive work born from a creative talent that was fully realized and beautifully executed. And ifHollywood doesn’t realize whyBarbiewas a smash hit and instead focuses on trying to replicate its success with another similar property, they risk diluting the very thing Gerwig subverted and instead becoming yet another recognizable IP.

Oppenheimer’s breakout success illustrated further evidence of what studios should be doing, as it was another unmistakably director-driven project and unconcerned with the lowest common denominator. Post-pandemic, studios are understandably looking for the surest path to breakout box office hits, but what bothBarbieandOppenheimerprove is that the key may be for executives to trust their filmmakers to bring their visions to life, and have confidence that if their works deliver, audiences will show up.